AI in radiology: 27-source review finds AI chest X-ray flags actionable nodules in 0.59% vs 0.25%

Zenodo 2026 · 1 min read
Actionable nodules detected on chest X-rays · with vs without AI
0.59% vs 0.25%
Single-center randomized trial, 10,476 health-checkup participants, CT-confirmed
Sources reviewed
27
Five selected radiology tasks; main evidence cutoff June 13, 2026
Unique PubMed records retrieved
2,337
Reproducible July 2026 search used to map and cross-check sources, not as exhaustive screening

Arkangel AI whitepaper: a 27-source review of five radiology tasks finds AI evidence strongest for bounded tasks like mammography support.

This Arkangel AI whitepaper is a rapid narrative evidence brief that synthesizes 27 sources on five selected radiology tasks: assisted mammography reading, detection of specific chest radiograph findings, prioritization and efficiency, segmentation or quantification, and text support for reports. The main search ran on June 13, 2026, with a reproducible PubMed retrieval in July that returned 2,337 unique records for mapping and source verification in September. Selection was neither exhaustive nor done by two independent reviewers, and each task was rated across six evidence levels, from retrospective discrimination to routine implementation.

Within this corpus, the most developed prospective evidence was for mammography reading support in organized screening programs, notably the Swedish MASAI trial. In a single-center randomized trial of 10,476 health-checkup participants, radiologists reading chest radiographs with AI support found CT-confirmed actionable nodules in 0.59% of participants versus 0.25% without it. Triage showed heterogeneous effects on reading times and workload, segmentation lacked a general level of clinical maturity, and language-model report support still needs human oversight because of errors. Regional sources, including one Mexican retrospective study with an AUC of 0.774 for COVID-19 on CT, do not show generalizable effectiveness in Latin America. It is a whitepaper, not peer reviewed, and the authors are affiliated with Arkangel AI.

Results at a glance

The headline numbers from the paper, in plain language.

MetricValueWhat it means
Actionable nodules detected on chest X-rays · with vs without AI0.59% vs 0.25%Single-center randomized trial, 10,476 health-checkup participants, CT-confirmed
Sources reviewed27Five selected radiology tasks; main evidence cutoff June 13, 2026
Unique PubMed records retrieved2,337Reproducible July 2026 search used to map and cross-check sources, not as exhaustive screening

How to cite

Katherine Monsalve, Natalia Castaño-Villegas, Jose Zea, Laura Velásquez. Supportive AI in Five Selected Radiology Tasks: Limits and Governance for Latin America. Zenodo. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22943530

@article{monsalve2026supportive,
  title     = {{Supportive AI in Five Selected Radiology Tasks: Limits and Governance for Latin America}},
  author    = {Katherine Monsalve and Natalia Castaño-Villegas and Jose Zea and Laura Velásquez},
  journal   = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.22943530},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22943530}
}

More research from Arkangel AI

All research →

For hospitals and insurers

Validate these results at your institution

We run the model on your own clinical records with your team, under your privacy and governance rules.

Start a research partnership
Read paperCite