AI in gastroenterology and hepatology: 18-source review finds assisted colonoscopy most mature, but outcome benefit unproven

Zenodo 2026 · 1 min read
Sources reviewed
18
10 clinical or technical, 5 implementation and governance frameworks, 3 institutional
Adenoma detection with AI assistance
48.2%
Versus 57.0% conventional in a Brazilian study of 305 colonoscopies; no significant difference
Macro sensitivity · gastric anatomical classification
85.5%
Colombian Gastro UNAL system, 13 regions, specificity 98.8%

Arkangel AI whitepaper: 18 sources show assisted colonoscopy is the most mature GI use of AI, but evidence on outcomes and in Latin America is thin.

This Arkangel AI whitepaper is a narrative review of 18 selected sources on artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology: ten clinical or technical studies, five implementation and governance frameworks, and three institutional sources. It covers colonoscopy, upper and capsule endoscopy, liver fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and specialist referral review, and classifies each task by evidence maturity, from development to routine implementation.

Computer-aided colonoscopy is the most mature application, but its endpoints are detection and workflow, not mortality or cancer incidence, and the 2025 AGA and ESGE guidelines differ on it. Regional evidence is limited: a Brazilian study of 305 screening colonoscopies found adenoma detection of 48.2% with AI versus 57.0% without, with no significant difference, and a Colombian system reached 85.5% macro sensitivity and 98.8% specificity classifying 13 gastric regions, which is not cancer detection. A Brazilian referral model reached 0.716 accuracy across five specialties. The authors recommend starting with bounded tasks, local validation and human review. It is a whitepaper, not peer reviewed.

Results at a glance

The headline numbers from the paper, in plain language.

How the model performed

Higher is better

Data: Versus 57.0% conventional in a Brazilian study of 305 colonoscopies; no significant difference · Colombian Gastro UNAL system, 13 regions, specificity 98.8% — Zenodo 2026

Show the numbers as a table
MetricValueWhat it means
Sources reviewed1810 clinical or technical, 5 implementation and governance frameworks, 3 institutional
Adenoma detection with AI assistance48.2%Versus 57.0% conventional in a Brazilian study of 305 colonoscopies; no significant difference
Macro sensitivity · gastric anatomical classification85.5%Colombian Gastro UNAL system, 13 regions, specificity 98.8%

How to cite

Katherine Monsalve, Natalia Castaño-Villegas, Jose Zea, Laura Velásquez. AI in gastroenterology and hepatology A narrative review of applications, evidence maturity, and governance implications for Latin America. Zenodo. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22948678

@article{monsalve2026gastroenterology,
  title     = {{AI in gastroenterology and hepatology A narrative review of applications, evidence maturity, and governance implications for Latin America}},
  author    = {Katherine Monsalve and Natalia Castaño-Villegas and Jose Zea and Laura Velásquez},
  journal   = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.22948678},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22948678}
}

More research from Arkangel AI

All research →

For hospitals and insurers

Validate these results at your institution

We run the model on your own clinical records with your team, under your privacy and governance rules.

Start a research partnership
Read paperCite