AI in digital pathology: 24-source review finds detection and grading most mature, molecular prediction still retrospective

Zenodo 2026 · 1 min read
Sources reviewed
24
Selected for coverage of tasks, evidence stages and regional applicability
Direct Latin American sources
2
An expert Delphi panel and a narrative review with an expert panel; neither measures effectiveness
Countries in the regional Delphi panel
7
Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico and Peru

Arkangel AI whitepaper: 24 sources show AI is most mature for bounded slide detection and grading, with only 2 direct Latin American sources.

This Arkangel AI whitepaper is a community evidence brief on artificial intelligence in digital pathology, built from 24 selected sources after an exploratory search and a focused July 2026 update in Europe PMC. It organizes the evidence by task (detection and prioritization in whole-slide images, grading and quantification, molecular and tissue-of-origin prediction, and workflow and telepathology) and by stage, from retrospective development to routine implementation.

The most mature uses are bounded detection or prioritization tasks and support for grading or quantification, such as lymph node metastasis detection and Gleason grading; predicting molecular alterations or tissue of origin from histology remains mostly retrospective and does not replace molecular testing. Only two direct Latin American sources were found, a Delphi panel spanning seven countries and an expert review, and both describe barriers of cost, connectivity, regulation, training and interoperability rather than measuring effectiveness. The authors recommend reviewable tasks, validation by laboratory, stain and scanner, and explicit professional accountability. It is a whitepaper, not a systematic review and not peer reviewed.

Results at a glance

The headline numbers from the paper, in plain language.

MetricValueWhat it means
Sources reviewed24Selected for coverage of tasks, evidence stages and regional applicability
Direct Latin American sources2An expert Delphi panel and a narrative review with an expert panel; neither measures effectiveness
Countries in the regional Delphi panel7Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico and Peru

How to cite

Katherine Monsalve, Natalia Castaño-Villegas, Jose Zea, Laura Velásquez. Supportive AI in Digital Pathology Evidence, Limitations, and Governance for Latin America. Zenodo. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23024156

@article{monsalve2026supportive,
  title     = {{Supportive AI in Digital Pathology Evidence, Limitations, and Governance for Latin America}},
  author    = {Katherine Monsalve and Natalia Castaño-Villegas and Jose Zea and Laura Velásquez},
  journal   = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23024156},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23024156}
}

More research from Arkangel AI

All research →

For hospitals and insurers

Validate these results at your institution

We run the model on your own clinical records with your team, under your privacy and governance rules.

Start a research partnership
Read paperCite