AI in cardiology: 25-source review finds ECG and imaging AI validated, but clinical benefit rarely shown

Zenodo 2026 · 1 min read
Sources reviewed
25
20 articles with DOI and 5 official or policy documents
LV systolic dysfunction detected · AI digital stethoscope
24 vs 12
Of 587 vs 608 participants in a pragmatic randomized trial in Nigeria's obstetric population
Evidence-maturity stages mapped
5
Development, validation, clinical utility, impact and implementation

Arkangel AI whitepaper: a 25-source review finds cardiology AI strongest in ECG and imaging tasks, but rarely proven to change care.

This Arkangel AI whitepaper is a narrative review of artificial intelligence in cardiology across electrocardiography, cardiovascular imaging, risk stratification and remote monitoring, with a focus on what it means for Latin America. The authors searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Crossref and official WHO and PAHO sources, mostly from 2021 to 2026, and built a corpus of 25 sources: 20 articles with a DOI and 5 official or policy documents. Each application was placed on a map of five evidence-maturity stages, from retrospective development to routine implementation, and the version includes external review by a cardiologist.

Development and technical validation dominate. AI-ECG models reported C-indexes of 0.638 to 0.787 for mortality and cardiovascular outcomes, and an echocardiography model reached an AUC of 0.96 in external validation, but clinical utility, outcome impact and routine use were rarely shown. The clearest prospective example is a pragmatic randomized trial in Nigeria, where AI-assisted digital stethoscope screening detected left ventricular systolic dysfunction in 24 of 587 participants versus 12 of 608 with usual care (AUC 0.976 for LVEF below 50%). Direct Latin American evidence was limited, so regional recommendations are labeled as implementation inferences. It is a whitepaper, not peer reviewed, and the authors are mostly affiliated with Arkangel AI.

Results at a glance

The headline numbers from the paper, in plain language.

MetricValueWhat it means
Sources reviewed2520 articles with DOI and 5 official or policy documents
LV systolic dysfunction detected · AI digital stethoscope24 vs 12Of 587 vs 608 participants in a pragmatic randomized trial in Nigeria's obstetric population
Evidence-maturity stages mapped5Development, validation, clinical utility, impact and implementation

How to cite

Katherine Monsalve, Natalia Castaño-Villegas, Jose Zea, Laura Velásquez, Juan Nicolás Dallos Ferrerosa. IA en cardiología: revisión narrativa de aplicaciones, madurez de la evidencia e implicaciones de gobernanza para América Latina. Zenodo. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21817373

@article{monsalve2026cardiologia,
  title     = {{IA en cardiología: revisión narrativa de aplicaciones, madurez de la evidencia e implicaciones de gobernanza para América Latina}},
  author    = {Katherine Monsalve and Natalia Castaño-Villegas and Jose Zea and Laura Velásquez and Juan Nicolás Dallos Ferrerosa},
  journal   = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.21817373},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21817373}
}

More research from Arkangel AI

All research →

For hospitals and insurers

Validate these results at your institution

We run the model on your own clinical records with your team, under your privacy and governance rules.

Start a research partnership
Read paperCite