AI in mental health: chatbots eased depression in 18 trials, but not at 3 months

Zenodo 2026 · 1 min read
Randomized trials · AI chatbots
18
3,477 participants; depression Hedges g −0.26, no substantial effect at 3 months
Sources synthesized
26
Including 5 direct studies from Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Chile
Precision · depression-to-bipolar conversion
38%
72% sensitivity; 13,607 Colombian health records

Arkangel AI whitepaper: 26 sources back AI for text review, screening and structured chatbots, not autonomous diagnosis or crisis management.

This Arkangel AI whitepaper is a narrative community evidence brief, not a peer-reviewed study, systematic review or clinical guideline, on supportive AI in mental health in Latin America. It synthesizes 26 sources from PubMed/MEDLINE, PMC, Crossref, WHO, the American Psychiatric Association and the FDA (cutoff June 15, 2026), including 5 direct studies from Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Chile, and grades clinical-text analysis, assisted screening, conversational support, risk prediction, generative documentation and crisis detection by evidence stage.

Evidence is relatively more developed for natural-language processing, assisted screening and structured chatbots: a meta-analysis of 18 randomized trials with 3,477 participants favored short-course chatbots for depression (Hedges g −0.26) and anxiety (−0.19), with no substantial effect at three months. In Colombia, a retrospective study of 13,607 records predicted conversion from depression to bipolar disorder with 72% sensitivity but 38% precision, a signal rather than a decision rule. The authors find no support for autonomous diagnosis, unsupervised generative therapy, individual suicide prediction or automated crisis management, and recommend starting with reviewable documentation, search and prioritization under human accountability.

Results at a glance

The headline numbers from the paper, in plain language.

MetricValueWhat it means
Randomized trials · AI chatbots183,477 participants; depression Hedges g −0.26, no substantial effect at 3 months
Sources synthesized26Including 5 direct studies from Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Chile
Precision · depression-to-bipolar conversion38%72% sensitivity; 13,607 Colombian health records

How to cite

Katherine Monsalve, Natalia Castaño-Villegas, Jose Zea, Laura Velásquez. Supportive AI in Mental Health Clinical Text, Screening, Conversational Support, and Documentation in Latin America. Zenodo. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23087526

@article{monsalve2026supportive,
  title     = {{Supportive AI in Mental Health Clinical Text, Screening, Conversational Support, and Documentation in Latin America}},
  author    = {Katherine Monsalve and Natalia Castaño-Villegas and Jose Zea and Laura Velásquez},
  journal   = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23087526},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23087526}
}

More research from Arkangel AI

All research →

For hospitals and insurers

Validate these results at your institution

We run the model on your own clinical records with your team, under your privacy and governance rules.

Start a research partnership
Read paperCite